Centrifugal and Positive Displacement Pumps
Introduction
Centrifugal pumps basically consist of a stationary pump casing and an impeller mounted on a rotating shaft. The pump casing provides a pressure boundary for the pump and contains channels to properly direct the suction and discharge flow. The pump casing has suction and discharge penetrations for the main flow path of the pump and normally has small drain and vent fittings to remove gases trapped in the pump casing or to drain the pump casing for maintenance.
Figure 1 is a simplified diagram of a typical centrifugal pump that shows the relative locations of the pump suction, impeller, volute, and discharge. The pump casing guides the liquid from the suction connection to the center, or eye, of the impeller. The vanes of the rotating impeller impart a radial and rotary motion to the liquid, forcing it to the outer periphery of the pump casing where it is collected in the outer part of the pump casing called the volute. The volute is a region that expands in cross-sectional area as it wraps around the pump casing. The purpose of the volute is to collect the liquid discharged from the periphery of the impeller at high velocity and gradually cause a reduction in fluid velocity by increasing the flow area. This converts the velocity head to static pressure. The fluid is then discharged from the pump through the discharge connection.
Centrifugal and Positive Displacement Pumps
Introduction
Centrifugal pumps basically consist of a stationary pump casing and an impeller mounted on a rotating shaft. The pump casing provides a pressure boundary for the pump and contains channels to properly direct the suction and discharge flow. The pump casing has suction and discharge penetrations for the main flow path of the pump and normally has small drain and vent fittings to remove gases trapped in the pump casing or to drain the pump casing for maintenance.
Figure 1 is a simplified diagram of a typical centrifugal pump that shows the relative locations of the pump suction, impeller, volute, and discharge. The pump casing guides the liquid from the suction connection to the center, or eye, of the impeller. The vanes of the rotating impeller impart a radial and rotary motion to the liquid, forcing it to the outer periphery of the pump casing where it is collected in the outer part of the pump casing called the volute. The volute is a region that expands in cross-sectional area as it wraps around the pump casing. The purpose of the volute is to collect the liquid discharged from the periphery of the impeller at high velocity and gradually cause a reduction in fluid velocity by increasing the flow area. This converts the velocity head to static pressure. The fluid is then discharged from the pump through the discharge connection.
Cavitation in Control Valves
Introduction
Cavitation has been a familiar phenomenon for a long time particularly in shipping. In 1917, the British physicist Lord Rayleigh was asked to investigate what caused fast-rotating ship propellers to erode so quickly. He discovered that the effect of cavitation, already proved in experiments by Reynolds in 1894, was the source of the problem. Despite numerous investigations into the subject of cavitation in the years that followed, many of the accompanying effects have still not yet been completely explained. This is no wonder considering the complexity of the process involving the areas of acoustics, hydrodynamics, thermodynamics, optics, plasma physics and chemistry.
Cavitation can be caused in a fluid by energy input. For example, a laser beam creates a plasma in liquids which causes the liquid to evaporate creating a cavity. Ultrasonic waves can be used to induce complex high-frequency alternating compression and rarefaction phases in liquids which cause cavitation. In this way, cavitation effects can be applied usefully for cleaning surfaces, for non-invasive operations in the field of medicine and for breaking down agglomerates in the textile finishing industry. In sewage treatment plants, cavitation is used to break down molecules and bacteria cell walls, break up pollutants and dissolve out minerals from organic material
Furthermore, cavitation can arise in hydrodynamic flows when the pressure drops. This effect is, however, regarded to be a destructive phenomenon for the most part. In addition to pump rotors, control valves are particularly exposed to this problem since the static pressure at the vena contracta even at moderate operating conditions can reach levels sufficient for cavitation to start occurring in liquids.
Cavitation in Control Valves
Introduction
Cavitation has been a familiar phenomenon for a long time particularly in shipping. In 1917, the British physicist Lord Rayleigh was asked to investigate what caused fast-rotating ship propellers to erode so quickly. He discovered that the effect of cavitation, already proved in experiments by Reynolds in 1894, was the source of the problem. Despite numerous investigations into the subject of cavitation in the years that followed, many of the accompanying effects have still not yet been completely explained. This is no wonder considering the complexity of the process involving the areas of acoustics, hydrodynamics, thermodynamics, optics, plasma physics and chemistry.
Cavitation can be caused in a fluid by energy input. For example, a laser beam creates a plasma in liquids which causes the liquid to evaporate creating a cavity. Ultrasonic waves can be used to induce complex high-frequency alternating compression and rarefaction phases in liquids which cause cavitation. In this way, cavitation effects can be applied usefully for cleaning surfaces, for non-invasive operations in the field of medicine and for breaking down agglomerates in the textile finishing industry. In sewage treatment plants, cavitation is used to break down molecules and bacteria cell walls, break up pollutants and dissolve out minerals from organic material
Furthermore, cavitation can arise in hydrodynamic flows when the pressure drops. This effect is, however, regarded to be a destructive phenomenon for the most part. In addition to pump rotors, control valves are particularly exposed to this problem since the static pressure at the vena contracta even at moderate operating conditions can reach levels sufficient for cavitation to start occurring in liquids.
Arsenic Removal From Drinking Water By Advanced Filtration Processes
All over the world the presence of arsenic in water sources for human consumption has been raising great concern in terms of public health since many epidemiologic studies confirm the potential carcinogenic effect of arsenic. Because arsenic removal is the most frequent option for safe drinking water, the development of more efficient and sustainable technologies is extremely important. Membrane separation processes are suitable for water treatment because they can provide an absolute barrier for bacteria and viruses, besides removing turbidity and colour. Their application is a promising technology in arsenic removal since it does not require the addition of chemical reagents nor the preliminary oxidation of arsenite required in conventional treatment options. However, since membrane technologies such as reverse osmosis can be a very expensive and unsustainable treatment option for small water supply
systems, it becomes crucial that alternative methods are developed. This work presents a few conclusions based on a laboratorial study performed to evaluate the efficiency of arsenic removal using ultrafiltration, microfiltration and solar oxidation processes under different experimental conditions for relevant parameters. The results showed removal efficiencies higher than 90%. Key-words: safe drinking water, arsenic removal, membranes, public health.
Arsenic Removal From Drinking Water By Advanced Filtration Processes
All over the world the presence of arsenic in water sources for human consumption has been raising great concern in terms of public health since many epidemiologic studies confirm the potential carcinogenic effect of arsenic. Because arsenic removal is the most frequent option for safe drinking water, the development of more efficient and sustainable technologies is extremely important. Membrane separation processes are suitable for water treatment because they can provide an absolute barrier for bacteria and viruses, besides removing turbidity and colour. Their application is a promising technology in arsenic removal since it does not require the addition of chemical reagents nor the preliminary oxidation of arsenite required in conventional treatment options. However, since membrane technologies such as reverse osmosis can be a very expensive and unsustainable treatment option for small water supply
systems, it becomes crucial that alternative methods are developed. This work presents a few conclusions based on a laboratorial study performed to evaluate the efficiency of arsenic removal using ultrafiltration, microfiltration and solar oxidation processes under different experimental conditions for relevant parameters. The results showed removal efficiencies higher than 90%. Key-words: safe drinking water, arsenic removal, membranes, public health.