Solutions for effective and sustainable faecal sludge management (FSM) presents a significant global need. FSM is a relatively new field, however, it is currently rapidly developing and gaining acknowledgement. This chapter provides an introduction to what FSM is, some of the unique challenges of FSM, an overview of the systems level approach for implementation and operation presented in this book, and additional resources that are available on the internet.
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Related products
Wastewater Biogas to Energy
Overview
The organic matter in raw wastewater contains almost 10 times the energy needed to treat it. Some wastewater treatment works (WWTW) can produce up to 100% of the energy they need to operate, though more typically 60% of operational energy can be produced. Biogas is typically used to meet on site power and thermal energy needs. Export of gas to local industrial users, power producers or for use as a municipal vehicle fleet fuel is also possible. In a wastewater treatment works (WWTW) biogas is produced when sludge decomposes in the absence of oxygen, in digesters. This process is referred to as Anaerobic Digestion. South Africa was one of the first countries in the world to utilise digesters as part of sludge management at WWTW. Digesters at WWTW were, however, not built to capture and use the biogas produced, but rather to assist in sludge management. In most cases, digesters can actually be refurbished to allow for biogas collection.
Biogas (a methane-rich natural gas) derived from anaerobic digestion and captured at WWTW plants provides a renewable energy source which can be used for electricity, heat and biofuel production. At the same time the sludge is stabilized and its dry matter content is reduced. This sludge, or digestate (remaining solid matter after the gas has been removed), contains valuable chemical nutrients such as nitrogen and potassium, and can be used as an organic fertilizer.
Wastewater Biogas to Energy
Overview
The organic matter in raw wastewater contains almost 10 times the energy needed to treat it. Some wastewater treatment works (WWTW) can produce up to 100% of the energy they need to operate, though more typically 60% of operational energy can be produced. Biogas is typically used to meet on site power and thermal energy needs. Export of gas to local industrial users, power producers or for use as a municipal vehicle fleet fuel is also possible. In a wastewater treatment works (WWTW) biogas is produced when sludge decomposes in the absence of oxygen, in digesters. This process is referred to as Anaerobic Digestion. South Africa was one of the first countries in the world to utilise digesters as part of sludge management at WWTW. Digesters at WWTW were, however, not built to capture and use the biogas produced, but rather to assist in sludge management. In most cases, digesters can actually be refurbished to allow for biogas collection.
Biogas (a methane-rich natural gas) derived from anaerobic digestion and captured at WWTW plants provides a renewable energy source which can be used for electricity, heat and biofuel production. At the same time the sludge is stabilized and its dry matter content is reduced. This sludge, or digestate (remaining solid matter after the gas has been removed), contains valuable chemical nutrients such as nitrogen and potassium, and can be used as an organic fertilizer.
10 Acceptability aspects: Taste, odour and appearance
Access to safe drinking-water is essential to health, a basic human right and a component of effective policy for health protection. The importance of water, sanitation and hygiene for health and development has been reflected in the outcomes of a series of international policy forums. These have included health-oriented conferences such as the International Conference on Primary Health Care, held in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan (former Soviet Union), in 1978. Access to safe drinking-water is important as a health and development issue at national, regional and local levels. In some regions, it has been shown that investments in water supply and sanitation can yield a net economic benefit, as the reductions in adverse health effects and health-care costs outweigh the costs of undertaking the interventions. Experience has also shown that interventions in improving access to safe water favour the poor in particular, whether in rural or urban areas, and can be an effective part of poverty alleviation strategies. The World Health Organization (WHO) published three editions of the Guide-lines for drinking-water quality in 1983–1984, 1993–1997 and 2004, as successors to previous WHO International standards for drinking water, published in 1958, 1963 and 1971. From 1995, the Guidelines have been kept up to date through a process of rolling revision, which leads to the regular publication of addenda that may add to or supersede information in previous volumes as well as expert reviews on key issues preparatory to the development of the Guidelines.
10 Acceptability aspects: Taste, odour and appearance
Access to safe drinking-water is essential to health, a basic human right and a component of effective policy for health protection. The importance of water, sanitation and hygiene for health and development has been reflected in the outcomes of a series of international policy forums. These have included health-oriented conferences such as the International Conference on Primary Health Care, held in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan (former Soviet Union), in 1978. Access to safe drinking-water is important as a health and development issue at national, regional and local levels. In some regions, it has been shown that investments in water supply and sanitation can yield a net economic benefit, as the reductions in adverse health effects and health-care costs outweigh the costs of undertaking the interventions. Experience has also shown that interventions in improving access to safe water favour the poor in particular, whether in rural or urban areas, and can be an effective part of poverty alleviation strategies. The World Health Organization (WHO) published three editions of the Guide-lines for drinking-water quality in 1983–1984, 1993–1997 and 2004, as successors to previous WHO International standards for drinking water, published in 1958, 1963 and 1971. From 1995, the Guidelines have been kept up to date through a process of rolling revision, which leads to the regular publication of addenda that may add to or supersede information in previous volumes as well as expert reviews on key issues preparatory to the development of the Guidelines.
A Detailed Assessment of The Science and Technology of Odor Measurement
INTRODUCTION
Odors remain at the top of air pollution complaints to regulators and government bodies around the U.S. and internationally. Ambient air holds a mixture of chemicals from everyday activities of industrial and commercial enterprises.
A person’s olfactory sense, the sense of smell, gives a person the ability to detect the presence of some chemicals in the ambient air. Not all chemicals are odorants, but when they are, a person may be able to detect their presence. Therefore, an odor perceived by a person’s olfactory sense can be an early warning or may simply be a marker for the presence of air emissions from a facility. For whatever reason, it is a person’s sense of smell that can lead to a complaint. When facility odors affect air quality and cause citizen complaints, an investigation of those odors may require that specific odorants be measured and that odorous air be measured using standardized scientific methods. Point emission sources, area emission sources, and volume emission sources can be sampled and the samples sent to an odor laboratory for testing of odor parameters, such as odor concentration, odor intensity, odor persistence, and odor characterization. Odor can also be measured and quantified directly in the ambient air, at the property line and in the community, using standard field olfactometry practices, e.g. odor intensity referencing scales and field olfactometers.
A Detailed Assessment of The Science and Technology of Odor Measurement
INTRODUCTION
Odors remain at the top of air pollution complaints to regulators and government bodies around the U.S. and internationally. Ambient air holds a mixture of chemicals from everyday activities of industrial and commercial enterprises.
A person’s olfactory sense, the sense of smell, gives a person the ability to detect the presence of some chemicals in the ambient air. Not all chemicals are odorants, but when they are, a person may be able to detect their presence. Therefore, an odor perceived by a person’s olfactory sense can be an early warning or may simply be a marker for the presence of air emissions from a facility. For whatever reason, it is a person’s sense of smell that can lead to a complaint. When facility odors affect air quality and cause citizen complaints, an investigation of those odors may require that specific odorants be measured and that odorous air be measured using standardized scientific methods. Point emission sources, area emission sources, and volume emission sources can be sampled and the samples sent to an odor laboratory for testing of odor parameters, such as odor concentration, odor intensity, odor persistence, and odor characterization. Odor can also be measured and quantified directly in the ambient air, at the property line and in the community, using standard field olfactometry practices, e.g. odor intensity referencing scales and field olfactometers.
Activated Sludge Aeration Waste Heat for Membrane Evaporation of Desalination Brine Concentrate: A Bench Scale Collaborative Study
This study examines a potential membrane evaporation process to reduce brine concentrate volume at the San Antonio Water System’s (SAWS) 45.4 million liters per day (MLD) brackish water desalination facility in San Antonio, Texas, which is currently being constructed. This facility is a reverse osmosis (RO) process operating with 90% recovery by blending 37.9 MLD of permeate with 7.6 MLD of bypass water, producing 4.2 MLD of brine concentrate. The brine concentrate residuals are to be disposed of through deep-well injection. The deep-well injection process is anticipated to be expensive due to well-drilling costs and maintenance costs of operating at high injection pressures. Membrane evaporation systems are promising because they are compact systems and they can be used with low grade waste heat energy sources. This study investigates the potential of coupling membrane evaporation with waste heat generated from activated sludge aeration blowers.
Activated Sludge Aeration Waste Heat for Membrane Evaporation of Desalination Brine Concentrate: A Bench Scale Collaborative Study
This study examines a potential membrane evaporation process to reduce brine concentrate volume at the San Antonio Water System’s (SAWS) 45.4 million liters per day (MLD) brackish water desalination facility in San Antonio, Texas, which is currently being constructed. This facility is a reverse osmosis (RO) process operating with 90% recovery by blending 37.9 MLD of permeate with 7.6 MLD of bypass water, producing 4.2 MLD of brine concentrate. The brine concentrate residuals are to be disposed of through deep-well injection. The deep-well injection process is anticipated to be expensive due to well-drilling costs and maintenance costs of operating at high injection pressures. Membrane evaporation systems are promising because they are compact systems and they can be used with low grade waste heat energy sources. This study investigates the potential of coupling membrane evaporation with waste heat generated from activated sludge aeration blowers.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.