Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Related products
Wastewater Biogas to Energy
Overview
The organic matter in raw wastewater contains almost 10 times the energy needed to treat it. Some wastewater treatment works (WWTW) can produce up to 100% of the energy they need to operate, though more typically 60% of operational energy can be produced. Biogas is typically used to meet on site power and thermal energy needs. Export of gas to local industrial users, power producers or for use as a municipal vehicle fleet fuel is also possible. In a wastewater treatment works (WWTW) biogas is produced when sludge decomposes in the absence of oxygen, in digesters. This process is referred to as Anaerobic Digestion. South Africa was one of the first countries in the world to utilise digesters as part of sludge management at WWTW. Digesters at WWTW were, however, not built to capture and use the biogas produced, but rather to assist in sludge management. In most cases, digesters can actually be refurbished to allow for biogas collection.
Biogas (a methane-rich natural gas) derived from anaerobic digestion and captured at WWTW plants provides a renewable energy source which can be used for electricity, heat and biofuel production. At the same time the sludge is stabilized and its dry matter content is reduced. This sludge, or digestate (remaining solid matter after the gas has been removed), contains valuable chemical nutrients such as nitrogen and potassium, and can be used as an organic fertilizer.
Wastewater Biogas to Energy
Overview
The organic matter in raw wastewater contains almost 10 times the energy needed to treat it. Some wastewater treatment works (WWTW) can produce up to 100% of the energy they need to operate, though more typically 60% of operational energy can be produced. Biogas is typically used to meet on site power and thermal energy needs. Export of gas to local industrial users, power producers or for use as a municipal vehicle fleet fuel is also possible. In a wastewater treatment works (WWTW) biogas is produced when sludge decomposes in the absence of oxygen, in digesters. This process is referred to as Anaerobic Digestion. South Africa was one of the first countries in the world to utilise digesters as part of sludge management at WWTW. Digesters at WWTW were, however, not built to capture and use the biogas produced, but rather to assist in sludge management. In most cases, digesters can actually be refurbished to allow for biogas collection.
Biogas (a methane-rich natural gas) derived from anaerobic digestion and captured at WWTW plants provides a renewable energy source which can be used for electricity, heat and biofuel production. At the same time the sludge is stabilized and its dry matter content is reduced. This sludge, or digestate (remaining solid matter after the gas has been removed), contains valuable chemical nutrients such as nitrogen and potassium, and can be used as an organic fertilizer.
Drinking Water Treatment Plant Residuals Management Technical Report
INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) completed a review of discharges from water treatment plants (WTPs). The purpose of this report is to summarize the data collected during this review (principally covered in Sections 2, 3, 9, 10, and 11) and to serve as a technical resource to permit writers (primarily covered in Sections 4 through 8 and Sections 12 and 13). EPA selected the drinking water treatment (DWT) industry for a rulemaking as part of its 2004 Biennial Effluent Limitations and Guidelines Program planning process. EPA is not at this time continuing its effluent guidelines rulemaking for the DWT industry. In the 2004 Plan, EPA announced that it would begin development of a regulation to control the pollutants discharged from medium and large DWT plants. See 69 FR 53720 (September 2, 2004). Based on a preliminary study and on public comments, EPA was interested in the potential volume of discharges associated with drinking water facilities. The preliminary data were not conclusive, and the Agency proceeded with additional study and analysis of treatability, including an industry survey. After considering extensive information about the industry, its treatment residuals, wastewater treatment options, and discharge characteristics, and after considering other priorities, EPA has suspended work on this rulemaking.
Drinking Water Treatment Plant Residuals Management Technical Report
INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) completed a review of discharges from water treatment plants (WTPs). The purpose of this report is to summarize the data collected during this review (principally covered in Sections 2, 3, 9, 10, and 11) and to serve as a technical resource to permit writers (primarily covered in Sections 4 through 8 and Sections 12 and 13). EPA selected the drinking water treatment (DWT) industry for a rulemaking as part of its 2004 Biennial Effluent Limitations and Guidelines Program planning process. EPA is not at this time continuing its effluent guidelines rulemaking for the DWT industry. In the 2004 Plan, EPA announced that it would begin development of a regulation to control the pollutants discharged from medium and large DWT plants. See 69 FR 53720 (September 2, 2004). Based on a preliminary study and on public comments, EPA was interested in the potential volume of discharges associated with drinking water facilities. The preliminary data were not conclusive, and the Agency proceeded with additional study and analysis of treatability, including an industry survey. After considering extensive information about the industry, its treatment residuals, wastewater treatment options, and discharge characteristics, and after considering other priorities, EPA has suspended work on this rulemaking.
10 Acceptability aspects: Taste, odour and appearance
Access to safe drinking-water is essential to health, a basic human right and a component of effective policy for health protection. The importance of water, sanitation and hygiene for health and development has been reflected in the outcomes of a series of international policy forums. These have included health-oriented conferences such as the International Conference on Primary Health Care, held in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan (former Soviet Union), in 1978. Access to safe drinking-water is important as a health and development issue at national, regional and local levels. In some regions, it has been shown that investments in water supply and sanitation can yield a net economic benefit, as the reductions in adverse health effects and health-care costs outweigh the costs of undertaking the interventions. Experience has also shown that interventions in improving access to safe water favour the poor in particular, whether in rural or urban areas, and can be an effective part of poverty alleviation strategies. The World Health Organization (WHO) published three editions of the Guide-lines for drinking-water quality in 1983–1984, 1993–1997 and 2004, as successors to previous WHO International standards for drinking water, published in 1958, 1963 and 1971. From 1995, the Guidelines have been kept up to date through a process of rolling revision, which leads to the regular publication of addenda that may add to or supersede information in previous volumes as well as expert reviews on key issues preparatory to the development of the Guidelines.
10 Acceptability aspects: Taste, odour and appearance
Access to safe drinking-water is essential to health, a basic human right and a component of effective policy for health protection. The importance of water, sanitation and hygiene for health and development has been reflected in the outcomes of a series of international policy forums. These have included health-oriented conferences such as the International Conference on Primary Health Care, held in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan (former Soviet Union), in 1978. Access to safe drinking-water is important as a health and development issue at national, regional and local levels. In some regions, it has been shown that investments in water supply and sanitation can yield a net economic benefit, as the reductions in adverse health effects and health-care costs outweigh the costs of undertaking the interventions. Experience has also shown that interventions in improving access to safe water favour the poor in particular, whether in rural or urban areas, and can be an effective part of poverty alleviation strategies. The World Health Organization (WHO) published three editions of the Guide-lines for drinking-water quality in 1983–1984, 1993–1997 and 2004, as successors to previous WHO International standards for drinking water, published in 1958, 1963 and 1971. From 1995, the Guidelines have been kept up to date through a process of rolling revision, which leads to the regular publication of addenda that may add to or supersede information in previous volumes as well as expert reviews on key issues preparatory to the development of the Guidelines.
Study of Biogas Production by Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Treatment Plant Sludge
Abstract
In this study, a characterization protocol of sewage sludge in Algeria was carried out. Their objective was to study the process of anaerobic digestion for the production of biogas by analogy to experiments which have already been made in the literature on sludge have the same characteristic as our own product. Five models have been proposed to simulate the anaerobic digestion process; three for the production of biogas and two models for the degradation of organic matter. The performance of the proposed models have been validated with experimental data from the literature. The modeling of the volume of biogas produced was carried out by that of Gompertz and models proposed for different products. We observed a good agreement of the models proposed with the experimental data with a maximum value in r 2 = 0.9996 and minimum in ESM = 6.34 10 -4 . The modeling of the degradation of organic matter was carried out by the first order model (eq IV.19), and dimensionless models proposed. The latter gave a good agreement with the experimental data better than the model of the literature with a maximum value in r 2 = 0.9985 and minimum in ESM = 8.91 10 -4 .
Study of Biogas Production by Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Treatment Plant Sludge
Abstract
In this study, a characterization protocol of sewage sludge in Algeria was carried out. Their objective was to study the process of anaerobic digestion for the production of biogas by analogy to experiments which have already been made in the literature on sludge have the same characteristic as our own product. Five models have been proposed to simulate the anaerobic digestion process; three for the production of biogas and two models for the degradation of organic matter. The performance of the proposed models have been validated with experimental data from the literature. The modeling of the volume of biogas produced was carried out by that of Gompertz and models proposed for different products. We observed a good agreement of the models proposed with the experimental data with a maximum value in r 2 = 0.9996 and minimum in ESM = 6.34 10 -4 . The modeling of the degradation of organic matter was carried out by the first order model (eq IV.19), and dimensionless models proposed. The latter gave a good agreement with the experimental data better than the model of the literature with a maximum value in r 2 = 0.9985 and minimum in ESM = 8.91 10 -4 .
Odor Control
20 years ago there was little talk of odor control. WWTP’s and PS were located out of town, and odor was not a problem.
Today odor control is generally considered an essential process in sewage treatment plant design, and in many other industries.
Odor Control
20 years ago there was little talk of odor control. WWTP’s and PS were located out of town, and odor was not a problem.
Today odor control is generally considered an essential process in sewage treatment plant design, and in many other industries.
Energy from Wastewater Sewage Sludge in Lebanon
The Ministry of Energy and Water (MEW) and the Council for Development and Reconstruction (CDR) are considering investing in energy produced from
wastewater sludge through anaerobic digestion (AD). Currently, Lebanon has only a few constructed wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), however many
others are either under construction, under designphase assessment, or are envisioned to be assessed in the future. The goal of this study is to undergo a feasibility assessment to identify the WWTPs that meet the conditions to implement AD and elaborate the related technical specifications.
Energy from Wastewater Sewage Sludge in Lebanon
The Ministry of Energy and Water (MEW) and the Council for Development and Reconstruction (CDR) are considering investing in energy produced from
wastewater sludge through anaerobic digestion (AD). Currently, Lebanon has only a few constructed wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), however many
others are either under construction, under designphase assessment, or are envisioned to be assessed in the future. The goal of this study is to undergo a feasibility assessment to identify the WWTPs that meet the conditions to implement AD and elaborate the related technical specifications.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.